101 Loudoun Street SW
Leesburg, VA 20175
Phone: 703.777.6535
Fax: 703.777.6963


302 West Boscawen
Winchester, VA 22601
Phone: 540.667.8889

Handling cases in VA, WV and MD

WilliamsFord Proudly Announces that Peter A. Pentony is Now a Partner with the Firm.
New Partner, Great Clients, Same High Quality Service...

In April 2019, Cory and Pete obtained an $822,000 medical malpractice jury verdict on behalf of a Loudoun County Sheriff’s Deputy who was injured in a car crash and suffered injuries to his right ankle. He was referred to Dr. Cyrus Press of Center for Advanced Orthopaedics in Woodbridge. Dr. Press sent the plaintiff for an MRI, which revealed a possible lateral talus fracture. The radiologist recommended a CT scan to confirm the fracture. Dr. Press did not inform the plaintiff about the possible fracture and did not recommend a CT scan. Instead, he simply monitored the plaintiff’s condition over a period of months, while encouraging the plaintiff to go to physical therapy. During this time, the plaintiff’s pain worsened, and he was unable to bear weight on the injured ankle.

After several months of worsening pain, and specifically after Dr. Press’ comment to the plaintiff and his wife that the pain must be in the plaintiff’s head, the plaintiff sought a second opinion. The second opinion revealed the talus fracture which had been suggested on the original MRI. Surgery to repair it was performed almost immediately, but the fracture had been neglected for too long, preventing a successful union. Ultimately, the plaintiff required two more surgeries, one to fuse his ankle in order to mitigate the arthritic pain, and the other to lengthen his Achilles tendon which had contracted due to lack of use. The plaintiff was left with a fused ankle, arthritis, and a limited range of motion, making it difficult for him to perform the duties of his job, to play sports with his children, and to perform household maintenance such as climbing a ladder and mowing the lawn.

Plaintiff’s expert, Dr. Francis McGuigan of the Foot and Ankle Center at Georgetown University Hospital, testified that a CT scan is the gold standard for confirming the existence of a fracture, and that there was a short window of opportunity to repair a displaced lateral talus fracture to avoid severe problems in the future.  He testified that it was more likely than not that surgery to repair the fracture within the window of opportunity would have prevented the need for the subsequent surgeries, as well as the arthritis and other limitations suffered by the plaintiff.

Case Results

Honors & Memberships

Avvo - Rate your Lawyer. Get Free Legal Advice.

Connect with us:

Please note that case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Past successful case results do not guarantee or predict future results.